HomeLTELTE-U update: Wi-Fi coexistence debate continues

LTE-U update: Wi-Fi coexistence debate continues

A recent Wi-Fi Alliance workshop on the relationship of Wi-Fi and LTE over unlicensed spectrum continued the industry dialog on how the two technologies can co-exist with one another, and meanwhile, a new round of skeptical testing by CableLabs and an update of the LTE-U specification by the LTE-U Forum have emerged.

According to the Wi-Fi Alliance, meeting attendees included Amazon, Broadcom, Dell, Ericsson, Gibson Brands, Google, Intel, NTT, Qualcomm, Toyota and Verizon, among others. The Wi-Fi Alliance recently released a set of initial coexistence guidelines (downloadable from this page — presentations from the workshop are also available) for testing the impact of LTE-over-unlicensed on Wi-Fi

As a reminder, there are two flavors of LTE-over-unlicensed that are under debate — the most controversial of which is the proprietary form being driven by a group of vendors and operators in the LTE-U Forum, which relies on duty-cycling in order to not interfere with Wi-Fi; and the standardized License-Assisted Access or LAA, which relies on a listen-before-talk approach. The final spec for LAA is still working its way through the standards process. Qualcomm has a new infographic that breaks down the differences (see below) and also mentions its MuLTEfire technology designed for standalone LTE-over-unlicensed deployments.

Proponents of LTE-U have argued that it is as friendly to Wi-Fi as Wi-Fi is to itself, and the Wi-Fi Alliance said that it considered its coexistence testing based on “the impact of the [LTE-over-unlicensed] system on Wi-Fi users in the channel is no worse than the impact that would result from an additional Wi-Fi network introduced into the channel supporting the same traffic load as the system. A technology capable of being used in unlicensed channels is fair to Wi-Fi if its deployed implementations will always operate fairly as described above.”

However, in its latest update to the LTE-U specification, the LTE-U Forum acknowledged (pdf) that in situations with LTE-U small cells utilized by multiple providers, “there are scenarios where all available channels are occupied by Wi-Fi devices, which forces LTE-U [small cells] to operate on the same channel as Wi-Fi. Wi-Fi devices do not back off to LTE-U unless its interference level is above the energy detection threshold (-62dBm over 20MHz). Without proper coexistence mechanisms, LTE-U transmissions could cause considerable interference on Wi-Fi network relative to Wi-Fi.”

“Such an unplanned and unmanaged deployment of LTE-U [small cells] (femtocells, picocells) may result in excessive RF interference to the existing co-channel Wi-Fi and 4 LTE-U Forum other operator LTE-U nodes in the vicinity,” the LTE-U Forum spec said. “It is therefore critical for LTE-U SCs to choose the best operating channel while minimizing the interference caused to nearby Wi-Fi and LTE-U networks.”

In a statement on the Wi-Fi Alliance meeting, Qualcomm said that the company and its LTE-U partners “have had an ongoing dialogue with the Wi-Fi community to ensure that LTE-U does not cause any adverse impact on Wi-Fi.  We have a strong vested interest in ensuring that LTE-U coexists successfully with Wi-Fi in view of our own Wi-Fi business.

Qualcomm said that it “[looks] forward to continuing collaboration with the Wi-Fi Alliance and its members to answer questions, ease concerns, address issues, and reach agreement.”

CableLabs, meanwhile, has continued its testing of LTE-U with a sharp focus on co-existence, and presented its most recent results at the Wi-Fi Alliance meeting. In a recent blog entry, Jennifer Andreoli-Fang, principal architect in CableLabs’ network technologies group, Rob Alderfer, VP technology policy; and Nadia Yoza-Mitsuishi, wireless architect intern, documented the  test results and concluded that they “[highlight] the need for the open and collaborative R&D that we have long been urging, so that we can find solutions that actually work for everyone. … Hopefully LTE-U proponents will move toward actual collaboration.”

CableLabs has tested LTE-U and Wi-Fi coexistence in its offices and most recently, in a residential test house that it uses to examine Wi-Fi functionality in an actual home environment. Using off-the-shelf Wi-Fi access points and an LTE signal generator programmed for duty-cycling, CableLabs found that  “Wi-Fi performance suffered disproportionately in the presence of LTE-U” and that Wi-Fi throughput was degraded by 70% when LTE-U was on 50% of the time, and that longer on-times for LTE-U had an even greater impact. Comparatively, when the two Wi-Fi APs were sharing the spectrum, CableLabs said that the throughput was roughly 50:50.

Image: CableLabs
Image: CableLabs

“Why does LTE-U do disproportionate damage to Wi-Fi? The primary reason is that it interrupts Wi-Fi mid-stream, instead of waiting its turn,” the CableLabs authors wrote. “This causes errors in Wi-Fi transmissions, ratcheting down its performance. We ran tests across a range of duty cycles to explore this effect. In our test case of two networks sharing with each other, to maintain Wi-Fi at 50% throughput, LTE-U could be on for no more than 35% of the time.”

As far as the new spec, CableLabs said that “we’re still looking at it along with the rest of the Wi-Fi community, since it is again a product of their closed process, but we don’t think it changes much for our purposes here. And judging by the discussion at this week’s Wi-Fi Alliance workshop, much work remains to get to reliable coexistence.”

Qualcomm infographic
Qualcomm infographic
Previous post
Low power, low throughput IoT is focus of industry forum
Horizon 2020 IoT 5G
Next post
Horizon 2020 IoT 5G: Europe grasping for ICT relevance